Toward Efficiency Public Policy : Lessons from the Uzbekistan’s UzIMEI System

  • Malika Dilbarova Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ali Hamza Department of Statistical Sciences, Paolo Fortunati, University of Bologna, Italy
  • Ebrima Khan School of Business and Public Administration, University Of The Gambia, Gambia
  • Ana Kumalasari Public Administration Program, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Bojonegoro, Indonesia
Keywords: Efficiency; public policy; UzIMEI System

Abstract

This study critically examines the UzIMEI system—Uzbekistan’s mobile device registration and customs policy—through the lens of public administration, focusing on policy efficiency, digital governance, and social equity. Implemented in 2024, the UzIMEI system aimed to formalize imports and improve tax compliance. However, it has encountered significant operational challenges, including manual processing delays, a flat-rate fee structure that disproportionately burdens low-income users, and limited public awareness. Using a literature review methodology, this paper evaluates the administrative shortcomings of UzIMEI and draws comparative insights from international best practices in Indonesia, India, and Kenya. These countries have adopted digital automation, tiered taxation, and public outreach campaigns to improve policy compliance and public service delivery. The analysis highlights that effective public policy must balance efficiency with equity and transparency. The study concludes that a hybrid reform model—comprising digital system integration, progressive fee structures, and citizen engagement strategies—offers the most viable path forward. By implementing such reforms, Uzbekistan can enhance both the effectiveness and fairness of its public services, positioning itself as a leader in equitable digital governance. This research contributes to the broader discourse on digital transformation and inclusive policy-making in emerging public administration contexts.

References

Canela-cacho, J., Dempsey, H., Dery, D., Ellwood, J., Machado, D. G., Goldman, N., Kirp, D., Lavin, J., Levenson, L., Levin, M. A., Macrae, D., Marzke, C., Mende-, J., Hare, M. O., Page, S., Patashnik, E., Radin, B., Roemer, A., Rosenthal, L., … Weimer, D. (2000). A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis.

Soskis, B. (n.d.). CGD and Support to the Field of Biometric Identification for Development About this Case Study. 1–20.

Stadtländer, C. T. K.-H. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. Microbe Magazine, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1

Subirats, J. (2001). Public policy analysis. Gaceta Sanitaria / S.E.S.P.A.S, 15(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0213-9111(01)71557-9

United Nations Department of Economic and social Affairs. (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022. https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210019446

Customs Committee of Uzbekistan. (2025). Customs declaration procedures and IMEI registration policies. Official Reports of the Customs Committee. Retrieved from [Customs Committee Website].

GSMA. (2018). The impact of mobile device registration policies in Kenya. GSMA Mobile Policy Handbook.

Jain, P., Sharma, R., & Desai, A. (2021). GST reforms and their impact on the electronics market in India. Economic Policy Review, 15(3), 45-60.

World Bank. (2021). Improving efficiency through customs automation: Lessons from Indonesia. Customs Modernization Series. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

Gazeta.uz. (2024). Analysis of Uzbekistan’s customs system reforms and their impacts. Gazeta Reports.

CGD (Center for Global Development). (2022). Biometric payments and digital privacy in Afghanistan: Adoption and trust-building. Policy Briefs.

Pfutze, T. (2021). Social protection and subsidy effectiveness in developing countries: Lessons from Indonesia. Development Policy Journal, 12(2), 100-120.

Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641

Published
2025-09-30